This market has settled: RESOLVED
Settled on May 28, 2026
Kharg Island no longer under Iranian control by May 31?
Kharg Island no longer under Iranian control by May 31? Odds: 0.9% YES on Polymarket. See live prices and trade this market.
This market gives extremely low odds to Iran losing control of its strategically vital Kharg Island oil terminal by May 2026, reflecting the massive military and geopolitical upheaval such an outcome would require. Kharg Island handles approximately 90% of Iran’s crude oil exports, making it the country’s most critical economic asset and a facility Iran would defend with overwhelming force.
Current Odds
| Platform | Yes | No | Volume | Trade |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polymarket | 1.1% | 98.9% | $9.8M | Trade on Polymarket |
Market Analysis
The bear case (supporting the 1.1% probability) recognizes that only a full-scale military conflict involving either the United States, Israel, or a regional coalition could conceivably result in Iranian loss of control over this heavily fortified island. Even in scenarios of expanded regional warfare following recent Israeli-Iranian tensions, capturing and holding Kharg Island would require amphibious assault capabilities, sustained air superiority, and willingness to accept massive casualties and economic disruption to global oil markets. Historical precedent shows that even during the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988), when Iraq repeatedly struck Kharg Island facilities, Iran never lost territorial control. The logistical challenges of an opposed amphibious operation against a determined defender with anti-ship missiles and air defenses make this scenario exceptionally unlikely within the 18-month timeframe.
The bull case requires believing that Israel’s ongoing military operations expand dramatically beyond current Gaza and Lebanon operations to include direct territorial objectives in Iran, or that the United States becomes involved in regime-change operations following a significant escalation. Traders pointing to the YES case would note increasing regional tensions, Iran’s nuclear program advancement creating potential 2025-2026 military intervention windows, and the possibility that internal Iranian instability could create power vacuums. Specific catalysts to monitor include potential Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities (which intelligence assessments suggest could occur in 2025), the June 2025 Iranian presidential election if current instability continues, and any major maritime incidents in the Persian Gulf involving U.S. naval forces.
Watch for naval deployments to the Persian Gulf by the U.S. Fifth Fleet exceeding normal carrier strike group rotations, Israeli defense establishment statements regarding “changing the regional balance,” and any Iranian moves to relocate oil export infrastructure that might signal leadership concerns about Kharg’s vulnerability. Oil market futures beyond mid-2026 would also signal trader expectations about Persian Gulf stability, as losing Kharg would immediately remove approximately 1.5 million barrels per day from global supply.
Related Markets
- Will Gretchen Whitmer win the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination? — 1% YES
- Will Wes Moore win the 2028 US Presidential Election? — 1% YES
- Will OpenAI have the best AI model at the end of May 2026? — 0% YES
Frequently Asked Questions
What would constitute “no longer under Iranian control” for this market’s resolution?
The market requires actual loss of territorial control, not just damage to facilities from airstrikes. Iran maintaining sovereignty while repairing bombing damage would resolve NO, while occupation by foreign military forces or a successful secessionist movement would resolve YES.
Has Kharg Island ever been captured or lost by Iran historically?
No. Despite extensive attacks during the Iran-Iraq War including Iraqi airstrikes and Exocet missile hits that damaged facilities, Iran continuously maintained control of the island throughout the conflict and its entire modern history as an oil terminal since the 1960s.
Why would military planners target Kharg Island specifically rather than simply blockading Iranian oil exports?
They likely wouldn’t—a naval blockade or sustained bombing campaign achieves oil export disruption without the extreme difficulty of amphibious assault. This makes the market’s low probability rational, as even in major conflict scenarios, territorial seizure of Kharg represents an unnecessarily costly objective compared to alternatives.