This market has settled: RESOLVED
Settled on March 22, 2026
Masoud Pezeshkian out by June 30?
Masoud Pezeshkian out by June 30? Odds: 40.0% YES on Polymarket. See live prices and trade this market.
Analysis: Masoud Pezeshkian’s Political Survival Through Mid-2025
Current Odds
| Platform | Yes | No | Volume | Trade |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polymarket | 40.0% | 60.0% | $98K | Trade on Polymarket |
Market Analysis
At 40% probability, traders are pricing meaningful but not overwhelming risk that Iran’s president exits office before June 30, 2025—a timeline that captures roughly the next 18 months of Iranian political turbulence. This market matters because presidential transitions in Iran carry cascading implications for nuclear negotiations, regional conflicts, and sanctions policy that move global energy and geopolitical risk markets.
The bull case for early removal rests on Iran’s structural instability and Pezeshkian’s weak political position. The president operates within a system where the Supreme Leader holds ultimate authority, and hardliners control parliament and the judiciary. Pezeshkian’s reformist agenda—including nuclear diplomacy—directly threatens hardline interests, particularly the IRGC’s economic empire. If nuclear talks collapse or sanctions tighten further in early 2025, hardliners have both motive and institutional levers to engineer his political collapse through parliamentary pressure, impeachment, or constitutional manipulation. Iran’s legislative elections are scheduled for March 2025, and a hardline supermajority could dramatically accelerate efforts to marginalize or remove him. Street protests over economic conditions remain volatile, and another major regional escalation could destabilize his government rapidly.
The bear case emphasizes Pezeshkian’s survival instincts and the Supreme Leader’s preference for stability. Despite weaknesses, Pezeshkian won a nationwide election in September 2024, giving him nominal legitimacy. The Supreme Leader, Khamenei, has shown willingness to tolerate moderate presidents when they don’t directly challenge his core prerogatives. Forcing a presidential removal within 18 months would require extraordinary political justification and risk international embarrassment. Most Iranian presidential crises unfold over years, not months. The March 2025 parliamentary elections, while likely to strengthen hardliners, won’t directly remove the president—they’ll simply constrain his legislative agenda. Without a catastrophic crisis (major war, economic collapse), the institutional friction alone makes mid-2025 removal a relatively low-probability event.
Watch the March 2025 elections closely for hardline gains and any immediate post-election moves to restrict presidential power. Monitor Iran nuclear negotiations through early 2025—any formal collapse in talks would dramatically increase hardliner pressure. Track IRGC statements and parliamentary rhetoric for impeachment threats. Regional escalation (Israel-Iran direct conflict, Yemen spillover) could either strengthen a wartime president or create pretext for removal depending on perceived failure. Finally, watch for economic data: if inflation or unemployment spike sharply in early 2025, street pressure could provide hardliners with justification for presidential change.
Related Markets
- Will Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez win the 2028 US Presidential Election? — 5% YES
- Will Chris Murphy win the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination? — 1% YES
- Will Greece win Eurovision 2026? — 6% YES
Frequently Asked Questions
What specific constitutional mechanism could remove Pezeshkian before his term ends in 2029?
Iranian parliament can impeach the president with a simple majority vote, though conviction requires a Supreme Court ruling. Alternatively, the Supreme Leader can effectively force resignation through institutional pressure or constitutional reinterpretation, as has occurred in Iranian history.
How would the March 2025 parliamentary elections directly impact this market’s outcome?
A hardline supermajority in parliament would dramatically increase leverage for impeachment or removal threats, though elections alone don’t automatically trigger departure—they shift power dynamics that could enable removal efforts.
Does this market expire before Pezeshkian’s actual 2029 term end date, and why?
Yes, the market expires December 31, 2026, requiring resolution 3.5 years before his scheduled term conclusion, so it only captures removal within a compressed timeframe