This market has settled: RESOLVED
Settled on June 8, 2026
Will there be 60 or more average daily transits of the Strait of Hormuz on June 30?
Will there be 60 or more average daily transits of the Strait of Hormuz on June 30? Odds: 3.3% YES on Polymarket. See live prices and trade this market.
Strait of Hormuz Transit Market Analysis
Current Odds
| Platform | Yes | No | Volume | Trade |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polymarket | 3.3% | 96.7% | $10K | Trade on Polymarket |
Market Analysis
The current 3.3% YES odds reflect near-consensus bearishness on maintaining 60+ daily transits through the Strait of Hormuz by June 2026, pricing in significant geopolitical disruption risk over the next 18 months. This market matters because the Strait handles roughly 20-25% of global maritime petroleum traffic; any sustained reduction signals either military escalation in the Persian Gulf, major sanctions regimes, or demand destruction from economic crisis—all with immediate macroeconomic consequences for energy prices and global trade.
The bull case rests on baseline normalcy prevailing. Current daily transits average 80-100 vessels depending on measurement methodology; sustaining 60+ merely requires a 20-40% reduction from present levels rather than catastrophic closure. This sets a relatively achievable threshold that only triggers if conflicts (Iran-Israel escalation, US-Iran tensions, or Saudi-Houthi dynamics) inflict meaningful but not total disruption. The bear case dominates current pricing: Iranian nuclear talks remain stalled with no breakthrough expected before 2026; the Houthi campaign against Red Sea shipping shows persistence rather than weakness; and a second Trump administration (likely scenario post-2024 election) historically favors maximum pressure Iran policy, raising the probability of new sanctions, naval posturing, or accidental escalation during 2025-26. Any full or near-full closure scenario—historically rare but plausible during active conflict—makes hitting 60 transits nearly impossible.
Key catalysts to monitor include Iran nuclear negotiations (JCPOA revival talks remain dormant but could restart if US political dynamics shift), Houthi missile capability and intent (track Red Sea attacks Q4 2024 into early 2025), and US policy shifts following January 2025 administration changeover. Congressional votes on Iran sanctions occur on unpredictable timelines but tend to cluster in Q1 and Q3 legislative sessions. Watch for any Israeli military operations in Iraq/Syria that could provoke Iranian responses, and monitor OPEC production decisions in 2025—reduced demand flows could also lower transits independent of geopolitical disruption.
Related Markets
- Xi Jinping out before 2027? — 7% YES
- Will Jamie Dimon win the 2028 US Presidential Election? — 1% YES
- Will Nikki Haley win the 2028 Republican presidential nomination? — 1% YES
Frequently Asked Questions
What’s the difference between a partial blockade and the 60-transit threshold?
A 60-transit minimum represents roughly 60% of baseline traffic; markets could sustain this even with selective closures (limited hours, certain vessel types) or localized attacks that reduce but don’t halt flows, whereas a full blockade would devastate this number.
How much do current Red Sea disruptions by the Houthis factor into this prediction?
Current Red Sea attacks are already diverting traffic around Africa rather than through Hormuz, so they reduce Hormuz transits now; the market is pricing whether Houthi capability escalates further or whether Iran directly joins interdiction efforts by 2026.
If Iran’s nuclear program advances significantly, what happens to this market?
Advanced Iranian nuclear capability would likely trigger new US/Israeli sanctions or military action, sharply increasing the odds of sustained Strait disruption and pushing YES odds much higher from current 3.3%.